Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beautiful People Ltd
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Jarboe. J04n(talk page) 00:21, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Beautiful People Ltd (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I earlier deleted this on speedy A9 as it appears the group had no WP article and there was nothing asserted here indicating notability . It has recently been re-created, and I see one of the artists has an article, so I do not know how to interpret the speedy criterion. I send it here, as this is one of the fields where I am not sufficiently knowledgable to proceed further. DGG ( talk ) 22:22, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. czar · · 23:48, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. czar · · 23:49, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Notable album by a notable artist that is backed by secondary sources and can potentially be expanded upon.--Soul Crusher (talk) 01:53, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to artist. No indication of meeting WP:NALBUM. Sources given appear to be either trivial mentions or not reliable sources. noq (talk) 09:01, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 22:39, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to artist. Fails WP:NALBUMS Transcendence (talk) 18:17, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.